Skip to main content

Barber, Leahy and Nelson meet in London April 30, 2014

Alain English
Actor and poet Alain English

by Linda Theil

The Central London Debating Society will host a debate on the Shakespeare authorship question at 7:30 p.m. April 30, 2014 at the The Olde Cock Tavern Pub, 22 Fleet Street, London. The event is being organized by London-based actor and poet, Alain English, who is an associate of the society. English said:
This will be an open panel debate with the motion "Does the Shakespeare Authorship Question Matter?". All the speakers will talk for five minutes before taking questions from the floor. The Central London Debating Society, of which I am a member, is cautious about approaching this subject matter having never really done so before but I am hoping if it is successful it will pave the way for a proper debate on the matter. We are looking for an extra speaker on the Stratfordian side just to balance things out a little but if not I will speak myself in addition to Alan Nelson, Ros Barber and William Leahy and I will introduce the topic.
The speakers are:
William Leahy, PhD, author of Shakespeare and his Authors
Ros Barber, PhD, author of The Marlowe Papers and Shakespeare: The Evidence
Alan H. Nelson, PhD, author of Monstrous Adversary

According to their webpage, The Central London Debating Society is open to anyone with an active interest in current affairs who would also like to improve their public speaking skills. Joining the society is free, and open to all. Join by sending an email to  info@clds.org.uk. Members are eligible to speak at a debate or chair an event.

Update 03/03/14: English announced yesterday that Alexander Waugh will join the panel of speakers and that the event will be filmed and made available on the Internet.

Update 05/04/14: See post-debate reports by Kevin Gilvary and Heward Wilkinson on the SOF website at http://www.shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/london-debate-does-the-authorship-question-matter/
also see a report in The Spectator May 1, 2014, 
"The Great Shakespeare Authorship Question" by Steerpike (including hundreds of comments by readers)

Update 05/20/14:
Debate organizer Alain English has made a video of the entire April 30, 2014 Central London Debating Society debate "Does the Shakespeare authorship question matter?" at the Olde Cock Tavern on Fleet Street, London, available on YouTube at :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEgCuQJQ6oY

Kevin Gilvary and Ros Barber at Olde Cock Tavern April 30, 2014

See also:

Resources:
http://www.taylor-walker.co.uk/pub/ye-olde-cock-tavern-holborn/c1188/

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h